HKD

Dipankar Chirag Baishya is with Jyotibikash Changmai and 4 others. 18 hrs · G Plus · Thank you Very much Mr H K Das, for pointing out my Name in the Context of 'Right of Reputation' which may also be applicable to my case as i m also a law abiding citizen of this country. My intention was never to malignant someones image, but if i hadn't brought the truth in front of everybody, would the Culprit had ever surrendered in front of the police. Or more importantly would the Culprit had been identified till date, firstly, why did he fleed the scene after committing the crime, why did his family tried to mislead the scenario by registering a Car theft case in Bharalumukh PS through the House Guard, why is his family still trying to protect Abhinash. Mr HK das, just think if it were you instead of Ganesh Rao, Wouldn't your family raise their voice for justice. I did the same to provide Justice to my Friend. I don't want cheap publicity. I don't want publicity at all. Tomorrow it could be me, it could be you or it could be somebody else. Who would face an accident caused by a persons irresponsible driving followed by consumption of heavy amount of alcohol. Mr HK Das, plz join hand with us and support the cause to provide #JUSTICEFOR GANESH. WE WILL BE VERY HAPPY TO HV U WITH US Once again thanks Mr HK Das -------------------------------------------------------JUSTIFICATION/RESPONSE BY HK DAS------------------------------------------------------- At the outset my deep condolences for the soul of your friend and May God give strength to the family to bear such a huge loss. Thanks a lot for appreciating the views of another common man. Our Constitution gives us freedom of speech and expression and so all of us cherish freedom. My writing was just another view in the subject of media trial. Your Justice for Ganesh movement; was just an example in the said writing like the recent incidents of mob lynching and same would have been incomplete without referring your name. Please do not take an offence of it. Now it is my humble request to you not to identify yourself with the writing, it was just another view in the matter. There are many instances which you may not know happening, wherein such face book protests led to serious violation of law and media has played a pivotal role leading tarnishing reputation of individuals which has been condemned by Hon’ble Supreme Court with strong words. My view is against this new mechanism of holding people guilty ‘digitally’ before trial by Court of law. You said you have faith in law and if so is the case, have faith that law will come down heavily against the guilt overlooking all attempts of distortion. I respect your feelings for your friend. But at the same time, I just failed to appreciate how naming of parents, uploading pictures of father in face book would have helped your cause. In my view the Right of Reputation applies to the so called culprit also. Nobody has got the right to tarnish reputation of another without an order from Court of law. As I have seen the sequence of events in your movement. The vehicle was found in the spot, photograph of the driver was taken and the driver fled away which is most common in all the cases. Recently one my close relative succumbed death in an accident wherein the driver fled away and the police personnel got hold of the driver and the owner within 3 days. Had the driver would not have surrendered in your movement; in such an eventuality the police would have followed the law giving him notice U/S 41A Cr.P.C. for appearance failing which arrested the accused. I do not disown the emotion of people and people has right to express their views and emotions. The law is equal for all and there is no requirement of upholding any discrimination by referring to a retired judge which is abridging the right of reputation of the retired judge. At the same time there is no requirement of criminalizing the culprit also in society. Even a hardcore criminal has got the right to life, if not curtailed by any order of Court. It has got serious consequences in future. Sorry to say, I just failed to buy the phenomenon of “online trial” emerging very fast. The police in our State have relentlessly working for maintaining law and order situation and deliver justice. So we do not require “online trial” and “online investigation”. Instances are at galore wherein Ministers and top bureaucrats got arrested in criminal offences before which a retired judge is very minimal. Therefore, even without criminalizing the culprit and tarnishing image of parents, which has been repeatedly condemned by Supreme Court, the family would have got justice. At last my deep sorrow and sympathy with the entire family especially to the small girl. N.B. I will not appreciate any unholy and demeaning personal comments from anybody.

0 Shares

Src

1. "Nobody dislikes publicity and media coverage. Basically it is the patent or latent yearning for exposure or to catch attention and appreciation which induces man to come out of the shell of introversion, if any, and show himself off, whether it be a public speech or a poetic flourish. It is this weakness or thirst for publicity which is exploited by the sharper stuff including the media to their advantage both for legitimate or illegitimate ends." These were your lines followed by mention of "one Dipankar Chirag Baishya". I wish it was not a personal comment made by you assuming that "one Dipankar" had patent and latent yearning of getting public attention and appreciation or thirst of publicity. Like you have the right to opine on a protester, I too have the right to opine on you. It was not a verdict by me, but an option or assumption that you MIGHT EITHER be a total naive OR very cunning, just like you guessed that "One Dipankar" might be gaining publicity to get out of introversion. 2. Neither me nor the protesters ever mentioned that there is no need for court of law as of date or that our statements were vedatim. All our motive was to appeal to the court of law to investigate and give justice. Never we took law in our hands. And all these happened 5 days after the accident when no action was taken, culprit was neither arrested nor even interrogated, neither any police came to victim's house to investigate. How long do you suggest we should wait for police/law people to act? 3. And silently depending on trial by court for justice has shown us what happened in the similar hit and run case by Salman Khan. 4. This was not a case of maligning someone randomly at the heat of the moment just based on assumptions, but was done after having enough evidence on the culprit and obviously here the crime had happened. 5. The culprit and his family and their reputation, you have shown your sympathy and concern for, have already confessed their crime and also accepted the fact that they filed false complaint of their car theft. 6. I am open to your opinion, you too should be pimento the opinion of the protesters and mine too. 7. Good night and sweet dreams.

0 Shares

hkd

Mr. SRC....at the outset thanks for the personal comments that you have made which just established your class and caliber. Now My article was just another point of view emphasizing on trial by court of law instead of general Public and media as well as social Network, wherein i have included the concept of right of reputation. If your lines are accepted in verbatim, then there is no requirement of court as on date. You along with the people can deliver justice. I Never said that guilty should not be punished. If the driver as well his family members did some mischief, then appropriate legal action will definitely follow. But that will not give liberty to anybody to malign or turnish Reputation of any countryman in public. I was shaken after following the incident. It was really unfortunate. I never condemed any protest. To protest is our democratic right. But protest does not mean maligning peoples image in public. Right of reputation, life and libeety is the core of our constitution. Even a convict has right to life if otherwise not curtailed by court of law. Article was a simple viewpoint in the subject of trial by social media. If you say that the article is misguiding then it would mean supreme court also misguided the country in its Verdict which is a contemtuous statement. Apart from that a different thought in media trial Projected in the Article, just citing the unfortunate accident and lynching by mob as an example can Be condemed by pervert like you by making personal comments. This is where the problem lies. U dont want to consume another view. Before garlanding me with the word Cunning, energize Your tiny little brain and get The soul of the Article. Read the article 2/3 times, so that you can understand the core. You are not above law. You can critisize me, but not by using unholy words and making personal comments. One more thing please go and study the law holding the field before pointing the loopholes. Lastly and not the least donot give a different meaning to the Article by adding your personal lines and questions as the article was confined only to right of reputation wherein the unfortunate accident was quoted as an example so that people can appreciate the moral. You can criticize me in any Manner even by making personal comments Because You belong to that breed. But you cannot stop my pen from writing the views which has been affirmed by supreme court Of India. So write Something better which can guide the society to a better direction.

1 Share